First-Pass Orotracheal Intubation: Video Laryngoscopy vs. Direct Laryngoscopy
jamanetwork.comdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23b7e/23b7ef43461e05623b3fdf2fa3ff38764ff3d4c5" alt="first-pass-orotracheal-intubation-video-laryngoscopy-vs-direct-laryngoscopy"
Among patients in the ICU requiring intubation, video laryngoscopy compared with direct laryngoscopy did not improve first-pass orotracheal intubation rates and was associated with higher rates of severe life-threatening complications.
Further studies are needed to assess the comparative effectiveness of these 2 strategies in different clinical settings and among operators with diverse skill levels.
Among 371 randomized patients, 371 completed the trial.
The proportion of patients with successful first-pass intubation did not differ significantly between the video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy groups.
The proportion of first-attempt intubations performed by nonexperts did not differ between the groups.
The median time to successful intubation was 3 minutes for both video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy.