Enteral vs. Parenteral Early Nutrition in Ventilated Adults with Shock

thelancet.com
enteral-vs-parenteral-early-nutrition-in-ventilated-adults-with-shock

In critically ill adults with shock, early isocaloric enteral nutrition did not reduce mortality or the risk of secondary infections but was associated with a greater risk of digestive complications compared with early isocaloric parenteral nutrition. After the second interim analysis, the independent Data Safety and Monitoring Board deemed that completing patient enrolment was unlikely to significantly change the results of the trial and recommended stopping patient recruitment.

Read More